Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
0 results
Search by author
  • Any Author
0 authors
  1. Sep 18, 2023
  3. Sep 15, 2023
  5. Sep 14, 2023
  7. Sep 08, 2023
    • GitBot's avatar
      Merge branch 'integrate/gitlab-ci/remove-release-name-from-deploy-target/into/main' into 'main' · cbdcc62c
      GitBot authored 
      Integrate gitlab-ci/remove-release-name-from-deploy-target and 10 more

See merge request !16
      cbdcc62c
    • GitBot's avatar
      Integrate gitlab-ci/remove-release-name-from-deploy-target and 10 more · 7dff9c44
      GitBot authored 
      --

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@f2a29f53

Refactoring: remove RELEASE_NAME from deploy targets

Append it to the configured target at the deploy class level instead.
This removes the need for eval'ing the variables before usage.
RELEASE_NAME can be used directly at the class level because it is known
from build-version.env.

This makes the deploy behavior identical to the Azure stage.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@e136e5e2

Remove top-level "release" folder from package

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@1d5e479f

Define MACHINE variable on job level

Instead of passing MACHINE from stage to stage or loading it from
testdata.json, use the original value from the Jinja2 loop and set it
directly for each job where it is used.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@cdd47023

Introduce separate variables to set RELEASE_NAME and RELEASE_VERSION

The expressions to calculate RELEASE_NAME and RELEASE_VERSION cannot be
stored within these variables themseselves. If set on the trigger level,
they would override the calculated values in build-version.env then,
as trigger variables always have the highest precedence.

Use separate variables RELEASE_VERSION_EXPRESSION and
RELEASE_NAME_EXPRESSION to define how RELEASE_VERSION and RELEASE_NAME
are calculated instead.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@372d192b

Use RELEASE_VERSION and RELEASE_NAME from build-version job

Instead of passing these variables from stage to stage or regenerating
their values in later stages, use the ones set in the build-version job
at all places.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@cad30c20

Remove RELEASE_SUFFIX variable

The RELEASE_NAME variable can be set directly now, so there's no need to
have a dedicated RELEASE_SUFFIX anymore. A previous configuration like

  RELEASE_SUFFIX: "-custom"

can now be achieved using:

  RELEASE_NAME: "Yocto-${RELEASE_VERSION}-custom"

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@922f49f8

Add yocto version job

This adds a machine-independent job "build-version" which populates the
RELEASE_VERSION and RELEASE_NAME variables, so that following jobs can
use these without depending on the various build jobs.
The variables can be set from the trigger job in a project's
`.gitlab-ci.yml` file. They are eval'ed before saving them to
version.env, so we can use deferred variable expansion or even command
execution to construct their values. This mechanism is already used for
the Flash-N-Go System variables.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@073ae81e

LAVA: rename MACHINE to LAVA_MACHINE

Rename variable in order to avoid confusion with the original MACHINE
variable used everywhere else. Also rename the local Jinja2 variable to
include an underscore to make naming consistent.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@a91baa55

Clean build.env before writing

This had been accidentally removed in
5e36715ef6cf98df4c1b98fedddc0c3c50ed4040.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@1860ca8e

Remove LOG_PREFIX variable

This was used in times when the same code was executed from different
places. We don't do that anymore, so the variable is obsolete.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@3d2dbe4d

Documentation: update job generation chapter
      7dff9c44
  9. Sep 04, 2023
  11. Aug 29, 2023
  13. Aug 28, 2023
  15. Aug 24, 2023
  17. Aug 22, 2023
  19. Aug 11, 2023
  21. Jul 27, 2023
    • GitBot's avatar
      Merge branch 'integrate/gitlab-ci/separate-images-in-multiple-pipelines/into/main' into 'main' · 4a9951d2
      GitBot authored 
      Integrate gitlab-ci/separate-images-in-multiple-pipelines and 1 more

See merge request !8
      4a9951d2
    • GitBot's avatar
      Integrate gitlab-ci/separate-images-in-multiple-pipelines and 1 more · 5f4ce40c
      GitBot authored 
      --

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@9406ad75

Yocto build: separate images in multiple pipelines

Instead of building the Yocto image, the Yocto SDK and the FNGSystem
image in one single pipeline, separate them into three independent
pipelines that are triggered in parallel.

This makes the concept more modular: we have a single general pipeline
now which is configurable from outside via variables. Hence we can have
a custom number of pipelines along with custom build targets in each
project without having to make code changes in the gitlab-ci project.

The default Yocto manifest pipeline configures three build pipelines:

- yocto-build-jobs
- sdk-build-jobs
- fngsystem-build-jobs

In a project including the Yocto manifest pipeline, we can disable
certain build pipelines using job rules, e.g. disabling the SDK build:

sdk-build-jobs:
  rules:
    - when: never

Furthermore we can add more pipelines by simply adding jobs extending
the '.build-jobs' class in the project's .gitlab-ci.yml:

yocto-custom-build-jobs:
  extends:
    - .build-jobs
  variables:
    BITBAKE_TASK: build
    CI_PARAM_IMAGE: custom-image
    CI_PARAM_DISTRO: custom-distro
    PACKAGE_TYPE: image

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@447804d2

.gitlab-ci: increase analyze timeout
      5f4ce40c
  23. Jul 26, 2023
  25. Jul 25, 2023
    • GitBot's avatar
      Integrate gitlab-ci/unify-image-and-sdk-package-jobs and 3 more · c24c95ca
      GitBot authored 
      --

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@5762a54c

Yocto build: unify image and SDK package jobs

Image and SDK package jobs call the same package script just with
different arguments. Instead of having two job classes `package_release`
and `package_sdk` for these two tasks, merge them into the base class
`package` and make the differences configurable via a variable
`PACKAGE_TYPE`.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@8e72eac2

Yocto build: add variable for manual builds

Instead of hard-coding the rules for manual builds in each actual job,
conditionally add this to the `buildbase` class and add a variable
`MANUAL_BUILD` to the according jobs.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@e6d71996

Yocto build: unify image and SDK build jobs

Image and SDK builds share a lot of similar code. Instead of having two
job classes `build_yocto_image` and `build_yocto_sdk` for these two
tasks, merge them into the base class `build_yocto` and make the
differences configurable via a variable.

The `dump_install_command` part of the script, which was not executed
for SDK builds, is always present now, but it's only executed if the
`INSTALLSCRIPT` variable is set, which is not the case for SDK builds.

The `collect_srcrevs` part of the script is executed in all cases. It
was not part of the SDK build before, but it's not less relevant there.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@f892500f

Yocto build: make main artifacts path configurable

Instead of specifying all possible artifacts paths and abusing the fact
that GitLab ignores non-existing paths during artifact upload, implement
a cleaner solution with a configurable path.
      c24c95ca
  27. Jul 24, 2023
  29. Jun 02, 2023
  31. Apr 24, 2023
  33. Apr 04, 2023
    • GitBot's avatar
      Merge branch... · 044c3610
      GitBot authored 
      Merge branch 'integrate/gitlab-ci/depend-pipeline-execution-on-branch-protection-state/into/main' into 'main'

Integrate gitlab-ci/depend-pipeline-execution-on-branch-protection-state and 2 more

See merge request !3
      044c3610
    • GitBot's avatar
      Integrate gitlab-ci/depend-pipeline-execution-on-branch-protection-state and 2 more · 1dadef00
      GitBot authored and Tim Jaacks's avatar Tim Jaacks committed 
      --

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@939ade2b

Depend intgration pipeline execution on branch protection state

Previously we had the master branch hard-coded in a variable in order to
determine whether to run the integration pipeline (on non-master branch)
or the merge pipeline (on master branch). This variable had to be
adapted everytime we copy a branch, which can potentially be forgotten
and lead to problems.

Remove the hard-coded branch and use the branch protection state for
this decision instead in order to make this more flexible.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@dbc49ad0

Simplify yamllint job rules

The rules for the yamllint jobs have been defined in the .yamllint class
before. They were overridden in the manifest pipeline's yamllint job,
though, which has its own rules, so we don't need them to be inherited
in this case. And in the manifest integration pipeline the rules can be
much easier, so define them there instead of at the class-level.

--

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@cd8de4ff

.gitlab-ci: add analyze stage for limiting YAML script blocks
      1dadef00
  35. Mar 21, 2023
    • GitBot's avatar
      Merge branch... · c58306b4
      GitBot authored 
      Merge branch 'integrate/gitlab-ci/use-project-path-in-integration-branch-name/into/main' into 'main'

Integrate gitlab-ci/use-project-path-in-integration-branch-name

See merge request !2
      c58306b4
    • GitBot's avatar
      Integrate gitlab-ci/use-project-path-in-integration-branch-name · db594996
      GitBot authored 
      --

Commit: seco-ne/yocto/infrastructure/gitlab-ci@e943a55e

Use project path instead of name in integration branch name

Usually project name and path are identical after project creation. It
is possible, though, to change the name of a project without changing
its path.
When triggering a pipeline on the integration branch, we are using the
CI_PROJECT_NAME variable to reference the project. Unexpectedly, this
variable contains the *path*, not the *name* of the project (see
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/20030).
Hence we have to use the project path in all other places where the
integration branch name is constructed in our Python code.
      db594996
  37. Mar 20, 2023
  39. Mar 10, 2023