From a746b578d8406b2db0e9f0d040061bc1f78433cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:19:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: Timeouts reach -1
With a postfix decrement these timeouts reach -1 rather than 0, but
after the loop it is tested whether they have become 0.
As pointed out by Jean Delvare, the condition we are waiting for should
also be tested before the timeout. With the current order, you could
exit with a timeout error while the job is actually done.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c | 4 ++--
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c
index edab51973bf550..a7c59908c457cb 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static unsigned int amd_ec_wait_write(struct amd_smbus *smbus)
{
int timeout = 500;
- while (timeout-- && (inb(smbus->base + AMD_EC_SC) & AMD_EC_SC_IBF))
+ while ((inb(smbus->base + AMD_EC_SC) & AMD_EC_SC_IBF) && --timeout)
udelay(1);
if (!timeout) {
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static unsigned int amd_ec_wait_read(struct amd_smbus *smbus)
{
int timeout = 500;
- while (timeout-- && (~inb(smbus->base + AMD_EC_SC) & AMD_EC_SC_OBF))
+ while ((~inb(smbus->base + AMD_EC_SC) & AMD_EC_SC_OBF) && --timeout)
udelay(1);
if (!timeout) {
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
index 6af68146c34248..bdb1f7510e9155 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pxa.c
@@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ static int i2c_pxa_do_pio_xfer(struct pxa_i2c *i2c,
i2c_pxa_start_message(i2c);
- while (timeout-- && i2c->msg_num > 0) {
+ while (i2c->msg_num > 0 && --timeout) {
i2c_pxa_handler(0, i2c);
udelay(10);
}
--
GitLab