From 76c714be0e5e60c935a53b31be58939510ba1d0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 18:56:19 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: pgtable: implement pte_accessible()
This patch implements the pte_accessible() macro, which can be used to
test whether or not a given pte is a candidate for allocation in the
TLB.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 7e074f93f383fe..450b355f3f49c2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -167,6 +167,16 @@ extern struct page *empty_zero_page;
((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER))
#define pte_valid_not_user(pte) \
((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_USER)) == PTE_VALID)
+#define pte_valid_young(pte) \
+ ((pte_val(pte) & (PTE_VALID | PTE_AF)) == (PTE_VALID | PTE_AF))
+
+/*
+ * Could the pte be present in the TLB? We must check mm_tlb_flush_pending
+ * so that we don't erroneously return false for pages that have been
+ * remapped as PROT_NONE but are yet to be flushed from the TLB.
+ */
+#define pte_accessible(mm, pte) \
+ (mm_tlb_flush_pending(mm) ? pte_present(pte) : pte_valid_young(pte))
static inline pte_t clear_pte_bit(pte_t pte, pgprot_t prot)
{
--
GitLab