From 00557b59c69ce284e5a61bcfcdbcc3dc867cb2da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:01:41 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix find_next_bit on 32-bit

We had a "64" that didn't get changed to BITS_PER_LONG, resulting
in find_next_bit not working correctly.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/lib/bitops.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/bitops.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/bitops.c
index b67ce3004ebf53..f68ad71a018749 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/bitops.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/bitops.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ unsigned long find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
 	tmp = *p;
 
 found_first:
-	tmp &= (~0UL >> (64 - size));
+	tmp &= (~0UL >> (BITS_PER_LONG - size));
 	if (tmp == 0UL)		/* Are any bits set? */
 		return result + size;	/* Nope. */
 found_middle:
-- 
GitLab